| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 5 post(s) |
Necharo Rackham
The Red Circle Inc.
Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork
27
   |
Posted - 2014.08.27 08:44:00 -
[1] - Quote
I did raise this issue at the Town Hall - re Frigate size wormholes being a fairly big problem for smallish C3 and under corps, but no one else agreed at the time.
Everyone needs to farm from time to time, and if the risk/reward ratio gets so skewed why would you even move to a low end wormhole to start with ? Unless you have alts outside making isk and just use the WH for pvp alone - but that's less activity in w-space and less fights generally.
|
Necharo Rackham
The Red Circle Inc.
Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork
27
|
Posted - 2014.08.27 16:05:00 -
[2] - Quote
Terrorfrodo wrote:
And it's also easy to bubble the hole which gives you some more time to kill the lone cloaky tackler frig while the big bad AF gang is still burning out of the bubble.
In which case you need an alt on every bubble to listen to activations - the cloaky isn't a tackler - he just gets a warp in for the inty that is.
[*] If you assume a 30 toon corp is actually just 10 people, all of whom dont' log in at once, then a whole lot of w-space is going to be empty fairly soon apart from PI farming. |
Necharo Rackham
The Red Circle Inc.
Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork
27
|
Posted - 2014.08.27 18:43:00 -
[3] - Quote
Pathas wrote:It's fairly easy to tell if this was a good or bad move - just look at WH prices.
That's not necessarily the case, there is both supply and demand. Less people generally in W-space will also lead to lower demand. |
Necharo Rackham
The Red Circle Inc.
Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork
35
|
Posted - 2014.08.28 16:47:00 -
[4] - Quote
epicurus ataraxia wrote:Noxisia Arkana wrote:CCP troll level for w space? 10/10. I'll admit that I bit. While you might very well think that, it is more likely that they really did not understand the consequences of their action, and as we are normally not overly vocal,so they thought that they probably knew what was best for us.
My own theory is that they realise they need to change nullsec, but are reluctant to do so without trialling some stuff out first, so at least some of these changes (and probably changes to lowsec and wspace in the future) are meant to model some analogous change in null. |
Necharo Rackham
The Red Circle Inc.
Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork
38
|
Posted - 2014.08.29 09:07:00 -
[5] - Quote
Afk Moon Goo wrote:
Not really; they changed stuff to wspace so blobbing is the way to go, ironically blobbing is exactly what made nullsec stagnant in first place.
You are assuming they understand the impact of the changes they make prior to them making them. One interesting thing is how often a devblog is posted and a fairly significant flaw is found within the first few pages of replies - usually within hours.
You'd figure that devs who must have already spent days thinking about the changes should be able to spot the most obvious exploits. |
| |
|